Kairn Pro vs 5103

We use the Tune Method to evaluate performance

Moderator: Staff

Post Reply
DeQMaster
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 75
Joined: 2009-08-24 01:09

Kairn Pro vs 5103

Post by DeQMaster »

I have a late Kairn Pro SMPS feeding my Klout and espeks.

I have been offered an av5105. IN therms of sound quality is that noticeable?

Are we talking about day/night difference?

Thanks!
User avatar
springwood64
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 1019
Joined: 2008-10-13 18:19
Location: UK

Post by springwood64 »

It depends on the age of the 5103. I had an early model (s/n 14**) and that sounded very similar to the Kairn Pro it replaced.

I then replaced this 5103 with a much later model which sounds significantly better.

Like you I started with Klout+Espeks, so if the 5103 is a late model (2001 or later) then you can expect a big improvement over the Kairn, and well worthwhile.
Pete
DeQMaster
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 75
Joined: 2009-08-24 01:09

Post by DeQMaster »

I think its 6100 something
anthony
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 809
Joined: 2007-02-04 22:39
Location: UK

5103

Post by anthony »

make sure it has blue display
Vereina
New member
New member
Posts: 7
Joined: 2009-03-20 18:02

Post by Vereina »

I used to have a Kairn Pro (with the SMPS), which I replaced, six years ago with a 5103 (blue display). In my view, much better. Not the best upgrade I've ever had, but definitely worthwhile.

Another useful feature of the 5103, at least for some systems, is that it has digital inputs. I find that for my (relatively cheap) DVD player and Squeezebox Receiver, using the 5103's DAC sounds rather better than the devices' audio outputs.
Post Reply