Efraim roots wrote: ↑2020-11-28 02:13
Exciting report Thomas! I will definitely try the 2.6+5 setting again! It was my first test just after i loosened my very tight original installation which had been running in for months. So maybe that's just not a fair comparison. Excited to hear that Lejonklou installed a karousel too :)
Just a reminder to try from around 2.6 +3 to 2.6 +7 in one notch increments in case your driver is a little different from mine and Fredrik's. That will probably be enough to cover it as these drivers generally seem to be pretty close together, but if 2.6 +7 sounds best try 2.6 +8. I always go until it starts to get worse and then back off.
The LP12 Whisperer
Manufacturer, Distributor, Retailer and above all lover of music.
Well, so you all agree with me. The first is Karousel with 3,5 Nm, the second is Thomas' recommended 2,6 + 5 clicks. In the room 2,6 +5 is vastly better.
Tendaberry wrote: ↑2020-11-29 21:37
Well, so you all agree with me. The first is Karousel with 3,5 Nm, the second is Thomas' recommended 2,6 + 5 clicks. In the room 2,6 +5 is vastly better.
I'm a bit late to the party too but wow...that ain't subtle! Thanks for posting those.
So, has Linn unwillingly hit the jackpot by making a bearing that can be tuned to the satisfaction of “audiophiles” (higher torques) and old school tune demmers (2.6 + 5)?! :-)
Late to the party too! The first clip had me distracted very quickly, wondering why the music had been selected. The second clip took about five seconds to convince.
The search for knowledge is not nourished by certainty, but by a radical distrust in certainty
Now I've tried the 2.6+5 setting again, coming from 3.4+4. I also tried the 4.0-3 setting which was my first stop.
I must have messed up the setting for 2.6+5 the first time around, I see from my notes that they have different reference for 2.6 (I write down the setting relative to a reference mark on the driver). I was probably a little eager since this was my first try ever to torque the karousel and focused mostly on getting the process right.
This third time around I'm getting close and I was very careful to get 2.6 just right! I tried 2.6+4 and 2.6+5 and I must say that that last 2.6+5 is truly great. I said before something like the low setting sounded like it 'trying to be a refined cirkus', the high setting sounded more like it 'was being itself'. But now when I got the 2.6+5 right I say this sounds like the essence of LP12!
Maybe I try a few more notches just in case our drivers a little off. Actually when I tried ThomasOK values for LP12 I have been a little surprised that settings exactly match.
Efraim - I see you thought the same like I did making the adjustments from a reference setting - I thought if I use the 1.6 +1notch for the arm I can use that as reference to go from there in complete 0.2Nm turns and know where 2.6Nm should be ... however Fredrik told me thats not the way to go - so it always leaves us to get the initial start setting right
Defender wrote: ↑2020-11-30 19:21
Efraim - I see you thought the same like I did making the adjustments from a reference setting - I thought if I use the 1.6 +1notch for the arm I can use that as reference to go from there in complete 0.2Nm turns and know where 2.6Nm should be ... however Fredrik told me thats not the way to go - so it always leaves us to get the initial start setting right
I used a magnifying glass to set the 2,6 Nm precisely and then added the 5 clicks. And no, I haven't tried +4 or +6 clicks, because +5 clicks felt so overwhelmingly right.
Defender wrote: ↑
Efraim - I see you thought the same like I did making the adjustments from a reference setting - I thought if I use the 1.6 +1notch for the arm I can use that as reference to go from there in complete 0.2Nm turns and know where 2.6Nm should be ... however Fredrik told me thats not the way to go - so it always leaves us to get the initial start setting right
I used a magnifying glass to set the 2,6 Nm precisely and then added the 5 clicks. And no, I haven't tried +4 or +6 clicks, because +5 clicks felt so overwhelmingly right.
I agree. You can hear it even just listening to the clip. :-)
Defender wrote: ↑
Efraim - I see you thought the same like I did making the adjustments from a reference setting - I thought if I use the 1.6 +1notch for the arm I can use that as reference to go from there in complete 0.2Nm turns and know where 2.6Nm should be ... however Fredrik told me thats not the way to go - so it always leaves us to get the initial start setting right
I used a magnifying glass to set the 2,6 Nm precisely and then added the 5 clicks. And no, I haven't tried +4 or +6 clicks, because +5 clicks felt so overwhelmingly right.
I agree. You can hear it even just listening to the clip. :-)
I agree (surprise, surprise) that clip 2 is easily more musical. I found Clip 1 boring and Clip 2 engaging to the point I listened to the entire clip and would have listened to more.
I replied to this post because of the emphasis beck put on Tendaberry's comment that 2.6+5 felt overwhelmingly right. I was trying to indicate the same thing when I said that I didn't bother rechecking around that torque on my last set of tests because it just sounded so right. Every time I have applied that torque to a Karousel/Keel I have felt the music was just as it was supposed to be - "overwhelmingly right" hits the nail on the head. I get that same feeling when I use 3.4Nm even on a Kore or Majik sub chassis. I don't know why it is better lower on the Keel but I'm more interested in what works than I am in why. At least when it comes to things like this.
By the way, my experience is that these torque drivers do tend to be pretty close. Mine is one notch different from Fredrik's at .4Nm but by .6Nm they are the same and appear to stay that way above there. That is pretty close when we are only talking about .02Nm pre notch.
The LP12 Whisperer
Manufacturer, Distributor, Retailer and above all lover of music.
I transferred the new value to the Karousel and it is much better than 4Nm. Much better actually means more musicality. It reminds me of the step from EKOS II to EKOS/SE. Maybe a touch too much, but guess the direction is right.
Thanks to Thomas for his tireless work to improve the LP12 and to share his experiences.
Hermann wrote: ↑2020-12-03 09:49
Maybe a touch too much, but guess the direction is right.
I think I know what you are hinting at Hermann.
To me you either accept that sounds have to come together and blend to get a proper musical performance or you accept to loose some of it in exchange of separation.
Linn went for separation with their recommended 4.0 nm torque.