Linn Reconsider 'Source First'

General HiFi discussion, using the Tune Method to evaluate performance

Moderator: Staff

Post Reply
sunbeamgls
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 770
Joined: 2012-04-04 15:19
Location: North Wales
Contact:

Linn Reconsider 'Source First'

Post by sunbeamgls » 2019-10-14 16:32

They haven't said as much, but with the re-introduction of the Klimax DS and Akurate DS in Katalyst versions, are Linn recognising that a 'source first' company ought to produce their best digital sources in a form that can live happily in non-Linn systems?

Of course, its good to see these products back and, with 2 policy reversals in as many months, good to see that they can recognise that they're not infallable.
AEDSM; AEBox/1; 3x Tundra Stereo 2.5; PMC 20.26. Blogger. Exakt Design. SO measuring.

User avatar
Matteo
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 434
Joined: 2018-01-25 14:12
Location: Milano, Italia

Re: Linn Reconsider 'Source First'

Post by Matteo » 2019-10-14 17:31

Will they also reconsider analogue pre?

M.
LP12/Kore/Akito 2b/ARadikal/Adikt/Slipsik 7-ND5 XS 2-AK/1-A2200-M109 [Silver-K200]

David Neel
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 644
Joined: 2008-02-08 23:17
Location: In the groove

Re: Linn Reconsider 'Source First'

Post by David Neel » 2019-10-14 17:38

Matteo wrote:
2019-10-14 17:31
Will they also reconsider analogue pre?

M.
Luckily it doesn't matter. A Sagatun or two will do the job better!
The less a person knows, the more certainly he knows it.

Defender
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 312
Joined: 2018-02-14 22:35

Re: Linn Reconsider 'Source First'

Post by Defender » 2019-10-14 18:28

they opened a gap and Fredrik took over the market - they have no chance to come back ;)

More serious: they said they are not able! to make the Klimax Kontrol any better and there is even a video explaining how a pre can only make things worse. With this statement/video they lost creditability in my eyes. For me it was „pants down“ in front of everyone.
Matteo you probably have not heard a Sagatun as that is why David says its irrelevant if they reconsider.

linesrg
Member
Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 2019-08-23 17:59
Location: Aberdeenshire

Re: Linn Reconsider 'Source First'

Post by linesrg » 2019-10-15 11:51

sunbeamgls wrote:
2019-10-14 16:32
They haven't said as much, but with the re-introduction of the Klimax DS and Akurate DS in Katalyst versions, are Linn recognising that a 'source first' company ought to produce their best digital sources in a form that can live happily in non-Linn systems?

Of course, its good to see these products back and, with 2 policy reversals in as many months, good to see that they can recognise that they're not infallable.
At the risk of sounding like the proverbial 'stuck record' any company that makes a single policy reversal in short order loses some 'street cred', twice in a month surely indicates something more going on.

The problem now is how do you treat the next announcement from the company - do you take it at face value or maybe hang on for a month or two to see if they're sticking with it?????

Regards

Richard
Last edited by linesrg on 2019-10-15 12:13, edited 1 time in total.
LP12 Radikal/Keel/Urika II/Ekos/Krystal, Akurate DS/3, NAC-52/SNAXO c/w SC's, 3 x NAP250 + Isobariks

AlbannachFE
Member
Member
Posts: 38
Joined: 2017-12-09 14:43
Location: Scotland.

Re: Linn Reconsider 'Source First'

Post by AlbannachFE » 2019-10-15 12:02

As part of system hierarchy, Linn used to talk of preserving the signal as it travels through the system (or words to that effect), now they seem to advocate deliberate manipulation of the signal...

Charlie1
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 3051
Joined: 2007-12-11 00:30
Location: UK

Re: Linn Reconsider 'Source First'

Post by Charlie1 » 2019-10-15 12:53

My thoughts are that they are shifting their business towards what they see as a future market since all of us old school enthusiasts are slowly kicking the bucket. It's a brave new world; sleek looks, wireless, calibrated to the room, etc. and nothing like as enjoyable to listen to but their new customer base won't know any different.

sunbeamgls
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 770
Joined: 2012-04-04 15:19
Location: North Wales
Contact:

Re: Linn Reconsider 'Source First'

Post by sunbeamgls » 2019-10-15 14:59

AlbannachFE wrote:
2019-10-15 12:02
As part of system hierarchy, Linn used to talk of preserving the signal as it travels through the system (or words to that effect), now they seem to advocate deliberate manipulation of the signal...
Well, that's a matter of interpretation. Manipulation sounds like a bad thing but remember that unintentional manipulation of the signal happens everywhere, even when the intention is to preserve. Correcting known errors further down the chain sounds like it could be a good thing and could be said to be preserving the signal. Take your pick.
AEDSM; AEBox/1; 3x Tundra Stereo 2.5; PMC 20.26. Blogger. Exakt Design. SO measuring.

sunbeamgls
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 770
Joined: 2012-04-04 15:19
Location: North Wales
Contact:

Re: Linn Reconsider 'Source First'

Post by sunbeamgls » 2019-10-15 15:01

Charlie1 wrote:
2019-10-15 12:53
My thoughts are that they are shifting their business towards what they see as a future market since all of us old school enthusiasts are slowly kicking the bucket. It's a brave new world; sleek looks, wireless, calibrated to the room, etc. and nothing like as enjoyable to listen to but their new customer base won't know any different.
That's quite some sweeping statement Charlie. Is there suddenly a generation of people who can't listen to music for its emotional content? Perhaps you're right, but I hope not! Or are you saying that Linn no longer cares about the people who enjoy music for its emotional content? Which could be the case of course.
AEDSM; AEBox/1; 3x Tundra Stereo 2.5; PMC 20.26. Blogger. Exakt Design. SO measuring.

sunbeamgls
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 770
Joined: 2012-04-04 15:19
Location: North Wales
Contact:

Re: Linn Reconsider 'Source First'

Post by sunbeamgls » 2019-10-15 15:03

linesrg wrote:
2019-10-15 11:51
sunbeamgls wrote:
2019-10-14 16:32
They haven't said as much, but with the re-introduction of the Klimax DS and Akurate DS in Katalyst versions, are Linn recognising that a 'source first' company ought to produce their best digital sources in a form that can live happily in non-Linn systems?

Of course, its good to see these products back and, with 2 policy reversals in as many months, good to see that they can recognise that they're not infallable.
At the risk of sounding like the proverbial 'stuck record' any company that makes a single policy reversal in short order loses some 'street cred', twice in a month surely indicates something more going on.

The problem now is how do you treat the next announcement from the company - do you take it at face value or maybe hang on for a month or two to see if they're sticking with it?????

Regards

Richard
Indeed, although (IIRC) you'd have waited for more than 12 months for one of those reversals.
There's definitely 2 sides to these announcements, as you point out.
AEDSM; AEBox/1; 3x Tundra Stereo 2.5; PMC 20.26. Blogger. Exakt Design. SO measuring.

Defender
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 312
Joined: 2018-02-14 22:35

Re: Linn Reconsider 'Source First'

Post by Defender » 2019-10-15 17:05

I think the problem which becomes now visible at Linn starts way earlier.

There are less and less companies which have really good analog circuit design people.
The problem starts at university already - all teaching moves to digital.
Digital people are taking over - easy solutions for a complex problem. Their thinking is you just have to keep the signal in 0‘s and 1‘s and all is fine and you have no problem with the unintentional signal alterations which can happen to an analog signal. These people create the ideas of tomorrow with the knowledge they have.

... and it actually it works very good everywhere - see high speed internet, high resolution TV and high resolution photography - that supports their thinking and makes it difficult for them to understand that reproducing music might request a different approach. You see that at Linn with changing the analog signal as soon as possible to digital (Klimax DSM) and keeping the signal in the digital domain (Exakt) until they have! to change it which is at the very end at the loudspeaker.

This is also the reason why Keith Robertson at Linn said they couldnt do the Klimax Kontrol any better.
Because to do so they would have to have someone who creates analog circuit design ideas.
Thats my subjective opinion.

User avatar
Music Lover
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 1667
Joined: 2007-01-31 20:35
Location: In front of Lejonklou/JBL/Ofil

Re: Linn Reconsider 'Source First'

Post by Music Lover » 2019-10-15 19:36

Charlie1 wrote:
2019-10-15 12:53
. and nothing like as enjoyable to listen to but their new customer base won't know any different.
I'm fully convinced they would understand after a proper demo.
The key word is "proper"
It's all about musical understanding!

User avatar
lejonklou
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4607
Joined: 2007-01-30 10:38
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: Linn Reconsider 'Source First'

Post by lejonklou » 2019-10-15 21:27

Defender wrote:
2019-10-15 17:05
I think the problem which becomes now visible at Linn starts way earlier.

There are less and less companies which have really good analog circuit design people.
The problem starts at university already - all teaching moves to digital.
Digital people are taking over - easy solutions for a complex problem. Their thinking is you just have to keep the signal in 0‘s and 1‘s and all is fine and you have no problem with the unintentional signal alterations which can happen to an analog signal. These people create the ideas of tomorrow with the knowledge they have.

... and it actually it works very good everywhere - see high speed internet, high resolution TV and high resolution photography - that supports their thinking and makes it difficult for them to understand that reproducing music might request a different approach. You see that at Linn with changing the analog signal as soon as possible to digital (Klimax DSM) and keeping the signal in the digital domain (Exakt) until they have! to change it which is at the very end at the loudspeaker.

This is also the reason why Keith Robertson at Linn said they couldnt do the Klimax Kontrol any better.
Because to do so they would have to have someone who creates analog circuit design ideas.
Thats my subjective opinion.
Spot on!

Charlie1
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 3051
Joined: 2007-12-11 00:30
Location: UK

Re: Linn Reconsider 'Source First'

Post by Charlie1 » 2019-10-15 22:11

sunbeamgls wrote:
2019-10-15 15:01
That's quite some sweeping statement Charlie. Is there suddenly a generation of people who can't listen to music for its emotional content? Perhaps you're right, but I hope not! Or are you saying that Linn no longer cares about the people who enjoy music for its emotional content? Which could be the case of course.
I think I was in a slightly grumpy sweeping statement kind of a mood :)

I guess Linn are really trying to service both camps, existing oldies and build a new generation of customers. Naim are no different but they seem to be keeping more of their older customers happier in the process, staying closer to their founding principles.

And I'm sure you're right, Linn must want to retain as much emotional content as possible, but surely it can only be within the constraints of their chosen path.

Charlie1
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 3051
Joined: 2007-12-11 00:30
Location: UK

Re: Linn Reconsider 'Source First'

Post by Charlie1 » 2019-10-15 22:42

Music Lover wrote:
2019-10-15 19:36
I'm fully convinced they would understand after a proper demo.
The key word is "proper"
Yeah, that's probably right but what proportion of new younger global customers will get that opportunity or even be all that interested to attend. Maybe my negativity is unwarranted.

Post Reply