Page 3 of 3

Re: Majik 109 Modification

Posted: 2019-03-13 12:26
by Ferdydurke
and I have not liked the softer things like sorbothane
That matches my impressions. With spikes on a heavy sideboard (when it's impossible, to place them on stands...) these little speakers do a big leap forward. By the way, I had best results using "Soundcare Superspikes" from Norway, the most easy to use spikes, you can think of; they are so simple, so unimpressively plain and unpretensiously built, child-safe and, yes, cheap, that they probably fly beneath the radar of high brow audiophiles... ;-)
http://www.soundcare.no/
https://hifipig.com/soundcare-superspikes/

The spanish distributor for SEAS told me, that, finally!, the W15LY will be back in stock in a couple of days, so the modification can start soon. On this occasion I'd like to ask again, wether there are other areas of improvement like inner cabling or damping, that should be taken in consideration?

Thanks,
Christian

Re: Majik 109 Modification

Posted: 2019-05-20 00:32
by acaro
Did you ever end up doing the mod?

Re: Majik 109 Modification

Posted: 2019-05-28 13:19
by Discodave
Is this the type of mod a Linn dealer could carry out with ease? Wouldn't attempt it myself.

Re: Majik 109 Modification

Posted: 2019-05-31 15:50
by acaro
I don't think so as the woofer is not a stock Linn product. The woofers would have to be ordered seperately and then installed. Skill level to do this is pretty low. I would think that a repair shop could easily do it for you if you're uncomfortable with the task.

Re: Majik 109 Modification

Posted: 2019-06-05 17:34
by Discodave
Thanks, sorry I meant the Linn dealer would have the skill to do the mod if I gave him the hardware. I think you've answered my query anyway!

Re: Majik 109 Modification

Posted: 2019-10-14 13:59
by Zee9
I wonder if this mod would work in the ninkas as well. Aren the mid/bass units almost identical.

May not be worth the cost of the seas drivers. Curious!

Re: Majik 109 Modification

Posted: 2019-10-16 20:51
by ThomasOK
Zee9 wrote:
2019-10-14 13:59
I wonder if this mod would work in the ninkas as well. Aren the mid/bass units almost identical.

May not be worth the cost of the seas drivers. Curious!
I would guess probably not. The woofer for Majik 109 is a distinct part number on the Linn parts list and the Majik 109 spec sheet shows it to be a 5" unit. The Ninka bass drivers are 160mm or close to 6.5".

Re: Majik 109 Modification

Posted: 2019-10-17 14:43
by Matteo
Can you go Aktiv with a modified woofer?

M.

Re: Majik 109 Modification

Posted: 2019-10-17 21:58
by ThomasOK
If it is a drop in replacement with no changes needed to the passive crossover, as has been claimed, then there should be no problem using it active. Indeed an active system generally has gain controls for the drivers which should allow you to more precisely match driver levels to compensate for the reported difference in sensitivity of the drivers.

Re: Majik 109 Modification

Posted: 2019-11-03 22:57
by Ferdydurke
Hi folks,

I finally did it: swapped the SEAS Prestige woofer for the Excel-type.
After discussing possible issues with a guy who precisely offers modifications for theses speakers, concentrating exlusively on the passive crossover (he objected, the crossover implemented in the active cards might not match the slightly different parameters of the new woofer), I was expecting the worse. But... Right out of the box, the soldering still being warm, it took only 10 minutes and the woofers began to bloom. What you get is much more control, acuracy and timbre/richness of sound in the mid-bass range, increasing 3-dimensionality and soundstage dramatically. Eyes closed you wouldn't expect a speaker of this size...

To Matteo: Yes I did the modification in an all active configuration, that already compensates for some of the weeknesses of the cheaper woofers. And still it's a huge gain of precision and musicality, stunning. As a source nothing more than a humble Majik DS/0 D. Didn't even feel the need of adjusting the level of the aktiv-bass-cards, there seems to be no loss of homogeneity. The 2K seems even more at ease than before.

So thanks to acaro for sharing this great idea to the rest of us!
Ferdy

Re: Majik 109 Modification

Posted: 2019-11-03 23:58
by Matteo
Nice to hear it Ferdy

Happy for you

M.

Re: Majik 109 Modification

Posted: 2019-11-10 16:24
by acaro
Awesome to hear that this mod is having a positive impact in your listening experience. Years later, I'm still enjoying mine and remain reluctant to give them up. By the way, mine have been active since the mod.

Re: Majik 109 Modification

Posted: 2019-11-12 12:39
by Matteo
acaro wrote:
2019-11-10 16:24
Awesome to hear that this mod is having a positive impact in your listening experience. Years later, I'm still enjoying mine and remain reluctant to give them up. By the way, mine have been active since the mod.
Active with 6100 or x200?

Thanks

M.

Re: Majik 109 Modification

Posted: 2020-01-05 16:40
by acaro
I use it with 2 channels from my DSM and 4 channels on my 4100.

Re: Majik 109 Modification

Posted: 2020-05-25 15:33
by Enterk
In case there is still interest in this modification...
I just upgraded my 109s as suggested and have to say the improvement is audible straight away. Pretty much as described by others in this thread, the new units are a significant improvement in every aspect, additionally I have not found the 109s to be bright sounding after the modification at all, just more pleasurable to listen. My set up includes Linn Kairn preamp and Klout power amp. The installation was really straightforward and took 20 min to complete. Thank you to Acaro who started the thread and to all who provided details on their experience previously.

Re: Majik 109 Modification

Posted: 2020-05-25 17:39
by Matteo
Congratulations.

Acaro uses his mod. 109's in an aktiv configuration.

Does anyone try the mod. 109's in an Exakt system?

M.