What differences did you observe between the firmware versions?Music Lover wrote: previously user changed bios, upgraded the firmware etc
Which did you compare? How is that related to BIOS settings?
Moderator: Staff
Two of the four Intel 320 owned by Linnofil have the same fw of my 160 GB, so I don't think the disappointing performance can be attributed to fw version.k_numigl wrote:What differences did you observe between the firmware versions?Music Lover wrote: previously user changed bios, upgraded the firmware etc
Which did you compare? How is that related to BIOS settings?
lejonklou wrote:Nicolav, why don't you just sell your Intel 320 and get a new one?
Smart move. I think that is the only way forward in your present situation.Nicolav wrote:In fact, is what I'll do.
Not at all. It's very interesting to know that this can happen. Nobody knew about this before, so it has been very informative! Since I'm so happy with my 320's it would be hard to believe this can happen without a report from a tunedem person. Now we know this can happen and if anyone else reports performance problems we can point to a faulty SSD as a possible cause.Nicolav wrote:I'm sorry to have bored you with my complaints.
Can you change the order of action? I think it would be benefitial to be able to compare a new and the present SSD.Nicolav wrote:In fact, is what I'll do.lejonklou wrote:Nicolav, why don't you just sell your Intel 320 and get a new one?
I think that is a good idea. Testing is as we know the best way to gain knowledge. Does Paolo have a Intel 320 yet? It probably is faster and cheaper to ship nationally. I still belive that Nicolav's 320 is faulty, but testing with another 320 will clear that up. If Nicolav can do this test before he sells it then great. If not he can test relative to his ES.2 when he gets the new/other 320.k_numigl wrote:Can you change the order of action? I think it would be benefitial to be able to compare a new and the present SSD.
...
I believe it is premature to label Nicolav's SSD as faulty.
Hi Linnofil, unfortunately Paolo not yet have a intel 320 to compare.Linnofil wrote:I think that is a good idea. Testing is as we know the best way to gain knowledge. Does Paolo have a Intel 320 yet? It probably is faster and cheaper to ship nationally. I still belive that Nicolav's 320 is faulty, but testing with another 320 will clear that up. If Nicolav can do this test before he sells it then great. If not he can test relative to his ES.2 when he gets the new/other 320.k_numigl wrote:Can you change the order of action? I think it would be benefitial to be able to compare a new and the present SSD.
...
I believe it is premature to label Nicolav's SSD as faulty.
As Linnofil wrote; you provided very important information! I only thought that since you bought it second hand, you could probably sell without loss. And since it works for data, the new owner is likely to be happy with it.Nicolav wrote:In fact, is what I'll do.
I'm sorry to have bored you with my complaints.
Sorry, I obviously misled you.k_numigl wrote:What differences did you observe between the firmware versions?Music Lover wrote: previously user changed bios, upgraded the firmware etc
Which did you compare? How is that related to BIOS settings?
Yes, I'll try. But keep in mind that the result could be affected because on the other side there are no feet.k_numigl wrote:@Nicolav:
Can you test your PC _upside down_ ?
This is the only position my own is playing OK (= lively) in the moment.
I do not dare to describe the others.
Thanks, Klaus
Yes, graag, easy to tell.lejonklou wrote:Can you be more precise?