New firmware for DS: Cara
Moderator: Staff
- Music Lover
- Very active member
- Posts: 1673
- Joined: 2007-01-31 20:35
- Location: In front of Lejonklou/JBL/Ofil
No, I don't think it's possible to draw conclusions with just a few KDS's, we just have some indications.
Hence my interest hearing feedback from all DS owners so we can later on.
We had the same firmware discussion regarding Unidisk SC, Unidisk 2.1 and 1.1 some years back.
Hence my interest hearing feedback from all DS owners so we can later on.
We had the same firmware discussion regarding Unidisk SC, Unidisk 2.1 and 1.1 some years back.
It's all about musical understanding!
- monkeydevil
- Active Member
- Posts: 77
- Joined: 2007-01-31 18:25
- Location: Stockholm
Reflashing to Bute 0.6
Get LinnConfig 1.3-0.3 and the firmware for the Akurate DS (AkurateDs_1.1-0.6.zip) from here:
http://products.linn.co.uk/VersionInfo/ ... /Releases/
Unpack the firmware and install LinnConfig 1.3-0.3.
in LinnConfig right-click your DS and select "Reflash...". In the upcoming dialog click "Select ROM..." and choose the xml file located in the "bin" directory. Check "Device Recovery" and click "Reflash" afterwards.
You actually don't need LinnConfig 1.3-0.3 for reflashing (you could also use the actual one), but to configure the DS afterwards. Trying to configure Bute 0.6 (Note: for the Sneaky DS it's called 1.1-0.4) with the actual LinnConfig could result in errors.
HTH,
Axel
http://products.linn.co.uk/VersionInfo/ ... /Releases/
Unpack the firmware and install LinnConfig 1.3-0.3.
in LinnConfig right-click your DS and select "Reflash...". In the upcoming dialog click "Select ROM..." and choose the xml file located in the "bin" directory. Check "Device Recovery" and click "Reflash" afterwards.
You actually don't need LinnConfig 1.3-0.3 for reflashing (you could also use the actual one), but to configure the DS afterwards. Trying to configure Bute 0.6 (Note: for the Sneaky DS it's called 1.1-0.4) with the actual LinnConfig could result in errors.
HTH,
Axel
- Music Lover
- Very active member
- Posts: 1673
- Joined: 2007-01-31 20:35
- Location: In front of Lejonklou/JBL/Ofil
Sounds still ok on my Sneaky DS, maybe even better than 3.1.16. (At least better than Bute 0.9, haven't compared it with Bute 0.6 yet but must be very close.)Music Lover wrote:Just noticed Cara 3.1.17 beta was released some days ago.
Anyone tested it?
Axel
Last edited by sommerfee on 2009-06-14 16:28, edited 2 times in total.
Hi all, nice to see than new Cara 17 sounds better than Bute 0.9.
But is very strange that 0.9 sound very good on my system, indeed better than Cara 14 and 16. I'll try the 17 soon, maybe this is the right time? :D
But is very strange that 0.9 sound very good on my system, indeed better than Cara 14 and 16. I'll try the 17 soon, maybe this is the right time? :D
LP12/RadikalM/Keel/Ekos SE1/Ekstatik/Urika II/Klimax System Hub/Klimax Exaktbox's/10 Solos/A242
- monkeydevil
- Active Member
- Posts: 77
- Joined: 2007-01-31 18:25
- Location: Stockholm
Axel, thank you for the walkthgough!
Installed 06 yesterday, and it is soooo much better than 09! Every record I played suddenly was a lot better, tighter, funkier, better musicians. My wife commented on one record we listen to quite often "is this a live version?". It wasn't...
I'll hang on a little longer before I'll try Cara. I don't need it unless someone says it is clearly better. This is good! It feels a bit like going from Ikemi to 1.1, witch sounds a bit extreme of course but definitely bigger than 2.1->1.1. I think the improvement in tune was huge!
One thing though, after I installed 06 the ADS suddenly started to react seemingly on IR commaInds. It went in standby, skipped songs paused etc. I think these commands may have come from my laptop, so I disabled the IR port on it and the problems stopped. But it is strange.
Installed 06 yesterday, and it is soooo much better than 09! Every record I played suddenly was a lot better, tighter, funkier, better musicians. My wife commented on one record we listen to quite often "is this a live version?". It wasn't...
I'll hang on a little longer before I'll try Cara. I don't need it unless someone says it is clearly better. This is good! It feels a bit like going from Ikemi to 1.1, witch sounds a bit extreme of course but definitely bigger than 2.1->1.1. I think the improvement in tune was huge!
One thing though, after I installed 06 the ADS suddenly started to react seemingly on IR commaInds. It went in standby, skipped songs paused etc. I think these commands may have come from my laptop, so I disabled the IR port on it and the problems stopped. But it is strange.
- Music Lover
- Very active member
- Posts: 1673
- Joined: 2007-01-31 20:35
- Location: In front of Lejonklou/JBL/Ofil
I upgraded yesterday and went between Cara 17 to Bute 0.6 and back. Cara 17 is the best Cara version no doubt.Nicolav wrote:Tried Cara 17 today: as first impression it's not bad at all!
Not sure if it's better than Bute 0.9 or 0.6, I'll done a better listen in the next days.
Regards, Nicola
More detailed than Bute 0.6, a tiny bit more musical but lost the analogue nice sound in 0.6.
This is definitely a good step forward from all firmware’s after 0.6 that have been off in different ways.
I was little sad after testing Bute 0.9 and the two first Cara's but this makes me feel better again.
Keep it up Linn. :mrgreen:
I stay on Cara 17 and wait on the perfect Cara that has the best from both 0.6 and 17.
It's all about musical understanding!
- Music Lover
- Very active member
- Posts: 1673
- Joined: 2007-01-31 20:35
- Location: In front of Lejonklou/JBL/Ofil
Cara 18 seems to be a tiny bit worse than Cara 17 on my Sneaky DS. :(
http://forums.linn.co.uk/bb/showthread.php?tid=2842
Axel
At least this bug is fixed in Cara 18:Music Lover wrote:what are the changes in Cara 18?
http://forums.linn.co.uk/bb/showthread.php?tid=2842
Axel
Tried Cara 18 yesterday. 17 is more tuneful and generally more alive. 18 as more relaxed and warmy sound but musically less involving.
Cara 17=exciting and involving. Cara 18= rather boring and uninteresting (compared to 17) although better than Bute 0.9 from my memory!
Cara 17=exciting and involving. Cara 18= rather boring and uninteresting (compared to 17) although better than Bute 0.9 from my memory!
LP12/RadikalM/Keel/Ekos SE1/Ekstatik/Urika II/Klimax System Hub/Klimax Exaktbox's/10 Solos/A242
Same here on my Sneaky: Bute 0.9 was definitely out-of-tune for me (at least with default settings) while Cara 18 is only very slightly out-of-tune.Nicolav wrote:although better than Bute 0.9 from my memory!
Axel
P.S.: The speaker positions are +-1mm exact, have done this tune-dem using my Unidisk 1.1.
Last edited by sommerfee on 2009-07-19 07:04, edited 1 time in total.
That's very interesting. I haven't heard any Cara yet, but what you're describing is something I've found in many other areas; with a clear difference in sound, the optimal speaker position can be slightly different.Juuso wrote:Have you used tune dem to get the correct speaker positions before actually comparing the different Cara versions? I have noticed that I had to alter speaker the positions after a cara version update. The voicing is so different. After repositioning I find the 18 better to the 17
This can be used in AB demonstrations to favour one unit. If you tune the entire system with that unit, it will get an advantage over the others. Sometimes small, sometimes more significant.
I re-checked this using my headphones instead of speakers but got the same result: On my Sneaky DS firmware 3.1.17 is ok but 3.1.18 and 3.1.20 are slightly out-of-tune, at least when using the UPnP Linn interface to contol the DS (Kinsky, LeiaDS, ...).
But when I use the UPnP A/V interface (by using MediaStreamer or any other UPnP aware software) firmware 3.1.20 is definitely more in-tune! :shock: Very strange... Well, I think that's one of the reasons why it's called beta.
Axel
But when I use the UPnP A/V interface (by using MediaStreamer or any other UPnP aware software) firmware 3.1.20 is definitely more in-tune! :shock: Very strange... Well, I think that's one of the reasons why it's called beta.
Axel
Last edited by sommerfee on 2009-07-24 17:58, edited 1 time in total.
Just checked the version 3.1.23 which was released yesterday, and now it's in-tune again. While 3.1.17 was ok in tune I always thought it sounds a little bit too high - this is now ok, too.
So in total this seems to be the best sounding firmware ever (at least on my Sneaky DS), and I'm confident that the final version of Cara will be amazing.
Axel
P.S.: Beware of the new LinnKonfig 3.1.23, it will delete all previous installed versions without asking!
So in total this seems to be the best sounding firmware ever (at least on my Sneaky DS), and I'm confident that the final version of Cara will be amazing.
Axel
P.S.: Beware of the new LinnKonfig 3.1.23, it will delete all previous installed versions without asking!
- Music Lover
- Very active member
- Posts: 1673
- Joined: 2007-01-31 20:35
- Location: In front of Lejonklou/JBL/Ofil
What issues? I never noticed problems with that, at least so far.Music Lover wrote:Good as multiple Linnconfig introduce issues.
Yes, see http://www.lejonklou.com/forum/viewtopi ... =6390#6390Did you test DS firmware .20?
Axel
- Music Lover
- Very active member
- Posts: 1673
- Joined: 2007-01-31 20:35
- Location: In front of Lejonklou/JBL/Ofil
issues having more than one Config is that sometimes the firmware installation becomes corrupt resulting in that one firmware is displayed in Config, another is in the DS.
So in worst case your firmware test results aren't valid...
I suggest you delete all Linn related SW's, then install Config&Kinsky and test again.
So in worst case your firmware test results aren't valid...
I suggest you delete all Linn related SW's, then install Config&Kinsky and test again.
It's all about musical understanding!
I had some problems in the very past (and did not thought this is because of having more-than-one LinnConfig installed), but I could solve them by always deleting the contents of the "Temp" directory (\Documents and settings\<user name>\Local settings\Temp) prior to flashing the firmware. Because sometimes there were old fragments of the last firmware update in the Temp directory left.Music Lover wrote:issues having more than one Config is that sometimes the firmware installation becomes corrupt resulting in that one firmware is displayed in Config, another is in the DS.
Furthermore I always double-checked this, the version number in LinnConfig and the one in the DS shown by the Info dialog in LeiaDS. And the result was reproducable, if I went back to the last good one, it was in-tune again.
Since the installation of LinnKonfig 3.1.23 deleted all the previous ones, at least the very last firmware test should be valid. And since this version is in-tune the tests of the older Cara stuff became irrelevant anyway :lol:So in worst case your firmware test results aren't valid...
But thanks for the tips, I will follow them for the next tests.
What is Kinsky? :mrgreen:I suggest you delete all Linn related SW's, then install Config&Kinsky and test again.
- Music Lover
- Very active member
- Posts: 1673
- Joined: 2007-01-31 20:35
- Location: In front of Lejonklou/JBL/Ofil
I'm going to upgrade from .20 to .23 later today, get back with my thoughts.sommerfee wrote: Since the installation of LinnKonfig 3.1.23 deleted all the previous ones, at least the very last firmware test should be valid. And since this version is in-tune the tests of the older Cara stuff became irrelevant anyway :lol:
LeiaDS? :mrgreen:
It's all about musical understanding!