Linn Keilidh Versions

We use the Tune Method to evaluate performance

Moderator: Staff

Post Reply
Charlie1
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 4842
Joined: 2007-12-11 00:30
Location: UK

Linn Keilidh Versions

Post by Charlie1 »

I was gonna get my passive Keilidhs serviced with new Alcaps, or possibly Solens. They are an early pair fitted with the final version of tweeter (SPKR 015/3), or maybe the seller said it was the Ninka tweeter.

Anyway, before spending out on that work, I wondered if I should first buy the final Keilidh version (Feb '97 onwards), but not sure how much difference the other drive units made. Does anyone recall the benefit of the later Keilidh mid/bass unit? And anyone know if Linn had to modify the crossover at any stage to accommodate newer drive units - something that my speakers units will be missing?

Here's the Linn info...

Treble Unit change (From SPKR 015/1 to SPKR 015/2) Oct 1994 23,647/8
Treble unit upgraded to SPKR 015/3* Dec 1996 39,727/8
Bass/mid units upgraded from SPKR 013/2 to /4 Feb 1997 40,657/8

Lastly, it appears that the SPRK 015/5 was used in the Ninka, so what about the 015/4?
tpetsch
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 342
Joined: 2020-08-17 18:46
Location: United States

Re: Linn Keilidh Versions

Post by tpetsch »

I recall at the shop many many years ago we replaced both Keltik & Keilidh tweeters with the newer ones that Linn sent us, after I installed/played them into our Aktiv Keltik demo system we all looked at each other and asked what we heard and we all shrugged our shoulders, perhaps they slowly burned in over the weeks to perform slightly better but we never noticed. They definitely weren't worse.
Rega P10, Aphelion II, Aura. Naim CB 32.5/HC, Naxo 3-6/HC, 3x250 into K20/DMS.
User avatar
El Mero Mero
Active member
Active member
Posts: 107
Joined: 2007-11-04 22:38
Location: Sweden

Re: Linn Keilidh Versions

Post by El Mero Mero »

The ”Ninka” tweeter is SPKR 038/2. Currently using them in my active Kabers.
Charlie1
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 4842
Joined: 2007-12-11 00:30
Location: UK

Re: Linn Keilidh Versions

Post by Charlie1 »

Thanks both!
Spannko
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 2297
Joined: 2008-01-24 21:46
Location: North East of The Black Country, UK

Re: Linn Keilidh Versions

Post by Spannko »

The only change I have a clear memory of is the first tweeter upgrade, which I felt to be a significant upgrade in both sound and musicality. I’ve got a feeling that there was a cabinet upgrade too, which included the addition of a Kustone block.

The earlier tweeters looked like Scanspeak/Hiquphon derivatives, but the later versions looked like cheap tweeters cobbled onto expensive looking face plates. How this affected sound quality, I wouldn’t like to say, other than I haven’t found any of the later tweeters to be as musical as the Hiquphon’s.
Charlie1
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 4842
Joined: 2007-12-11 00:30
Location: UK

Re: Linn Keilidh Versions

Post by Charlie1 »

Thanks Spannko!
sunbeamgls
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 1089
Joined: 2012-04-04 15:19
Location: North Wales
Contact:

Re: Linn Keilidh Versions

Post by sunbeamgls »

015/1 mesh
015/2 mesh
015/3 curved inward bars
015/5 curved inward bars

All the above used in Keilidh. I tried 1, 2 and 3, marginally preferred the 2.
Not sure what became of 015/4 but it never seems to have appeared in a product.

Ninka, Katan, Ekwal and Espek used the 038 tweeter which is compatible with Keilidh and Keltik. 038/1 had a plastic faceplate and most failed due to overheating, it had a short shelf life. 038/2 is the same driver but with an alloy faceplate - this version is reliable. Most people who put a 038 in a Keilidh prefer them over 015, but not all, probably around 80-90% prefer 038.
KSH/0; KEBox/2; 3x Tundra Stereo 2.5; PMC fact.12. Blogger. Exakt Design. SO measuring.
Charlie1
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 4842
Joined: 2007-12-11 00:30
Location: UK

Re: Linn Keilidh Versions

Post by Charlie1 »

sunbeamgls wrote: 2024-02-03 18:38 015/1 mesh
015/2 mesh
015/3 curved inward bars
015/5 curved inward bars

All the above used in Keilidh. I tried 1, 2 and 3, marginally preferred the 2.
Not sure what became of 015/4 but it never seems to have appeared in a product.

Ninka, Katan, Ekwal and Espek used the 038 tweeter which is compatible with Keilidh and Keltik. 038/1 had a plastic faceplate and most failed due to overheating, it had a short shelf life. 038/2 is the same driver but with an alloy faceplate - this version is reliable. Most people who put a 038 in a Keilidh prefer them over 015, but not all, probably around 80-90% prefer 038.
Thanks Sunbeam - that's very helpful.
Post Reply