MQA
Moderator: Staff
Re: MQA
We agree. I would however go crazy if over night my record collection sounded differently because somebody had "remastered" the lot! :-)matthias wrote:Digital done right is not bad, but MQA is.beck wrote:No wonder I love my record collection so much.
Matt
It’s that live feeling…………….
- Music Lover
- Very active member
- Posts: 1673
- Joined: 2007-01-31 20:35
- Location: In front of Lejonklou/JBL/Ofil
Re: MQA
Agree, indeed very bad.matthias wrote:Digital done right is not bad, but MQA is.
That Meridian always refuse comparing MQA-files with uncompressed PCM-files, and refuse answering technical questions is rather telling.
It's all about musical understanding!
Re: MQA
IMO, the best term to describe MQA is UNRIGHTEOUS.Music Lover wrote:Agree, indeed very bad.matthias wrote:Digital done right is not bad, but MQA is.
That Meridian always refuse comparing MQA-files with uncompressed PCM-files, and refuse answering technical questions is rather telling.
Matt
Matt
Modified mains distribution / Macbook / Exposure pre + power (both modified) / JBL3677
Modified mains distribution / Macbook / Exposure pre + power (both modified) / JBL3677
-
- Very active member
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: 2012-04-04 15:19
- Location: North Wales
- Contact:
Re: MQA
Its an article that gets to the heart of the problems.
Shame but not a surprise that labels are signing up. Worse that What Hifi have 'reviewed' it without any reference to the non-technical issues.
Shame but not a surprise that labels are signing up. Worse that What Hifi have 'reviewed' it without any reference to the non-technical issues.
KSH/0; KEBox/2; 3x Tundra Stereo 2.5; PMC fact.12. Blogger. Exakt Design. SO measuring.
- Music Lover
- Very active member
- Posts: 1673
- Joined: 2007-01-31 20:35
- Location: In front of Lejonklou/JBL/Ofil
Re: MQA
Did they compare the sound quality?sunbeamgls wrote:Shame but not a surprise that labels are signing up. Worse that What Hifi have 'reviewed' it without any reference to the non-technical issues.
It's all about musical understanding!
-
- Very active member
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: 2012-04-04 15:19
- Location: North Wales
- Contact:
Re: MQA
I would have to go back and find a copy. I look at What Hifi for news, not opinion - I don't buy my own copy as their opinions are heavily based on advertising revenue. Alledgedly.Music Lover wrote:Did they compare the sound quality?sunbeamgls wrote:Shame but not a surprise that labels are signing up. Worse that What Hifi have 'reviewed' it without any reference to the non-technical issues.
KSH/0; KEBox/2; 3x Tundra Stereo 2.5; PMC fact.12. Blogger. Exakt Design. SO measuring.
-
- Very active member
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: 2012-04-04 15:19
- Location: North Wales
- Contact:
Re: MQA
Qobuz have launched 24 bit streaming. In their words 'without compromise'. Im guessing that means without propriety stealth DRM and 'folding'
KSH/0; KEBox/2; 3x Tundra Stereo 2.5; PMC fact.12. Blogger. Exakt Design. SO measuring.
- Music Lover
- Very active member
- Posts: 1673
- Joined: 2007-01-31 20:35
- Location: In front of Lejonklou/JBL/Ofil
Re: MQA
Don't hold your breath.sunbeamgls wrote:Qobuz have launched 24 bit streaming. In their words 'without compromise'. Im guessing that means without propriety stealth DRM and 'folding'
But generally, streaming and downloading is BAD as the files normally are messed with in various areas = Not the original recording.
It's all about musical understanding!
-
- Very active member
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: 2012-04-04 15:19
- Location: North Wales
- Contact:
Re: MQA
I expect you mean watermarking, which is a very fair point but at least those files don't need specialist hardware to play.Music Lover wrote:Don't hold your breath.sunbeamgls wrote:Qobuz have launched 24 bit streaming. In their words 'without compromise'. Im guessing that means without propriety stealth DRM and 'folding'
But generally, streaming and downloading is BAD as the files normally are messed with in various areas = Not the original recording.
KSH/0; KEBox/2; 3x Tundra Stereo 2.5; PMC fact.12. Blogger. Exakt Design. SO measuring.
Re: MQA
I have been listening to mqa albums on and off since the start of the year and I must admit it does have that boring old master tape sound to it.Not what I was expecting, less boom tizz compared to Tidals normal streams.I'm holding judgement.All recorded music is tweaked anyway and its all just an illusion.What is it about the sound you guys dont like?
I know that tune
Re: MQA
I could be wrong but i always presumed the master was what the artist recorded to tape which was then mixed on the desk(boom tizz) to give what we have on our stereos .I think the original recording is the illusion mqa is trying to create,well to these ears anyway :0)
I know that tune
Re: MQA
The only thing MQA are trying is to get rich.
If there was any musical merit to their methods they would have demonstrated it. Which they have consistently refused (and deliberately wasted my time on several occasions).
Such a blatant scam.
If there was any musical merit to their methods they would have demonstrated it. Which they have consistently refused (and deliberately wasted my time on several occasions).
Such a blatant scam.
Re: MQA
Yes,lejonklou wrote:The only thing MQA are trying is to get rich.
If there was any musical merit to their methods they would have demonstrated it. Which they have consistently refused (and deliberately wasted my time on several occasions).
Such a blatant scam.
what we can do is to boycott MQA as much as possible.
Matt
Matt
Modified mains distribution / Macbook / Exposure pre + power (both modified) / JBL3677
Modified mains distribution / Macbook / Exposure pre + power (both modified) / JBL3677
Re: MQA
Jings Almighty Fred!!!.Very strong accusation is that wise leaving that here !?...This is printed word, very risky behaviourlejonklou wrote:The only thing MQA are trying is to get rich.
If there was any musical merit to their methods they would have demonstrated it. Which they have consistently refused (and deliberately wasted my time on several occasions).
Such a blatant scam.
I know that tune
Re: MQA
Lego, please explain what you mean by 'risky'. And which accusation? That it's all about money or that it's a scam to resell music that is already available in your own secret proprietary format?
I'd also appreciate if you could share your thoughts on what is positive or even excusable about the MQA project. I have no idea how informed you are of their technology and business model. If you think it sounds good, how did you compare and with what?
I'd also appreciate if you could share your thoughts on what is positive or even excusable about the MQA project. I have no idea how informed you are of their technology and business model. If you think it sounds good, how did you compare and with what?
Re: MQA
Making accusations against an organisation in print without concrete evidence is setting yourself up for all sorts of legal complications.lejonklou wrote:Lego, please explain what you mean by 'risky'. And which accusation? That it's all about money or that it's a scam to resell music that is already available in your own secret proprietary format?
I'd also appreciate if you could share your thoughts on what is positive or even excusable about the MQA project. I have no idea how informed you are of their technology and business model. If you think it sounds good, how did you compare and with what?
Definition of scam:'A fraudulent scheme performed by a dishonest individual, group, or company in an attempt obtain money or something else of value. Scams traditionally resided in confidence tricks, where an individual would misrepresent themselves as someone with skill or authority, i.e. a doctor, lawyer'
As far as listening to MQA I can't see the point in comparisons ,I listened exclusively to MQA Tidal streams then went back to Tidal normal streams via pc and DAC can't say one was more enjoyable than the other,i then discovered i could stream tidal via DAC and android tablet and this was much more engaging and enjoyable than pc Tidal/mqa.Im borrowing a mqa DAC to stream mqa via tablet,not holding my breath . Too much noise online to have an opinion one way or another based on what I've read .
I know nothing about Mqas business model other than their directors withdrew more than £100k salary and had ~£12M cash in bank .Not really interested in their business affairs or their motives .One thing I'm not worried about is record labels getting ripped off,as that would certainly be a first ..Lol..Who knows maybe MQA will pull that one off :0)
'
I know that tune
Re: MQA
Your not a lawyer, are you Lego? That I call something a scam is a reflection of my opinion and can't possibly lead to any "legal complications".
Funny you can't see the point in comparing. To me that was all that mattered! At first I was honestly very intrigued by this new format and wanted to experience how much better those files could sound than regular FLACs. Little did I know then that MQA actively avoided all comparisons, but never explicitly said so - thereby wasting my time and money with "demonstrations" where no comparisons were allowed. Add to that the plan to let everyone pay for the use of this secret technology.
Jim Collinson explains the attempt at creating a supply chain monopoly and I honestly can't understand how anyone can defend this project unless they have an economic interest in it: https://www.linn.co.uk/blog/mqa-is-bad-for-music
I'm certain it will fail.
Funny you can't see the point in comparing. To me that was all that mattered! At first I was honestly very intrigued by this new format and wanted to experience how much better those files could sound than regular FLACs. Little did I know then that MQA actively avoided all comparisons, but never explicitly said so - thereby wasting my time and money with "demonstrations" where no comparisons were allowed. Add to that the plan to let everyone pay for the use of this secret technology.
Jim Collinson explains the attempt at creating a supply chain monopoly and I honestly can't understand how anyone can defend this project unless they have an economic interest in it: https://www.linn.co.uk/blog/mqa-is-bad-for-music
I'm certain it will fail.
- Music Lover
- Very active member
- Posts: 1673
- Joined: 2007-01-31 20:35
- Location: In front of Lejonklou/JBL/Ofil
Re: MQA
I hope you are right but sadly I think the opposite.lejonklou wrote:I'm certain it will fail.
When money can be earned...the wolves get together.
MQA is bad for all parties except for Meridian. BUT, as the owners to the music can (again) sell same old music in a new "better" format, they going to try hard.
And unfortunately, there are many less informed consumers that going to be fooled by the marketing message "better".
It's truly sad indeed.
It's all about musical understanding!
- Music Lover
- Very active member
- Posts: 1673
- Joined: 2007-01-31 20:35
- Location: In front of Lejonklou/JBL/Ofil
Re: MQA
fyi - Their business model has been clearly described by Meridian themselves and by numerous reviewer.Lego wrote: Making accusations against an organisation in print without concrete evidence is setting yourself up for all sorts of legal complications.
It's all about musical understanding!