+1beck wrote: I have changed my view on hifi over the years and am seeking a sound that can capture the essens of what I hear when standing in front of a live band and the JBL's are a step in that direction.
Matt
Moderator: Staff
+1beck wrote: I have changed my view on hifi over the years and am seeking a sound that can capture the essens of what I hear when standing in front of a live band and the JBL's are a step in that direction.
I'm not super impressed either, hence the comment I made about the sloppiness. Indeed, I had never originally intended these for the forum but had recorded them for my own use since swapping out big, heavy, ungainly speakers, especially when one goes on a stand that wobbles side to side, is somehow not a 30 second task! Also, as mentioned on the other thread, the 3677s aren't likely in the proper position yet. On top of all that my iPhone is a poor, old 5 with 16MB and it stopped recording on the short clip (the 3677 Jethro Tull) as it was out of room - so that one has a smaller overlap.lejonklou wrote:Not super impressed with your clips, Thomas. I had to listen many times to get an idea of the differences.
The ATCs sound more HiFi and full frequency, but for me there's more fever in Fever with the JBLs!
C'mon Charlie1, get out your thesaurus! Huge, enormous, gargantuan, titanic or the one I think suits them best, imposing! However, you have to remember that I have carefully brought up Debbie on black Isobariks and then the ATC 100s - neither of which can exactly be called a svelte speaker! So huge is pretty much to be expected here. As you can see they don't quite fit on the wall, with the right one overhanging a little into the hall. However, if I end up sticking with the 3677s I will be able to move the Yggdrasil with the LS-NAS and switch on it out of the way and slide the whole setup over so that it ends flush with the hallway wall. Since you really should listen in the dark, that alleviates most of the problem. ;-) I actually have a plan to make them more attractive that I will implement if I decide to keep them as my main speakers.Charlie1 wrote:Instant impression of the JBLs is nothing sound related, they look massive! Like, really big. I know you know what 'massive' means but I feel a need to say more. Second thought, what does Debbie think of them!? Have you got some Klingon cloaking technology up your sleeve? Or maybe a thin black veil is easier to obtain.
No, but these do seem to be in a league of their own. Still, you've obviously not hit a brick wall of disapproval which is a very good news under the circumstances.ThomasOK wrote:However, you have to remember that I have carefully brought up Debbie on black Isobariks and then the ATC 100s - neither of which can exactly be called a svelte speaker!
There are some odd things with the clips - or is it just on my end? The first one sort of fades away after about ten seconds, then comes back. The second one has a glitch where the music skips.Charlie1 wrote:Rejigged things. The main rack is actually about 20mm further away from the wall now.
The first recording has the LP12 much further out than the rack. The second recording has it inline with the rack although still about 20cm further out than the previous rack location:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/98dbvrqcsslhn ... l.MOV?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0r0bafkulhy2p ... l.MOV?dl=0
It's not the files themselves. They also play fine direct from dropbox. Do you play them direct or download them first? I suspect your Internet service was congested if you play them directly off the website. If not, then no idea.lejonklou wrote:There are some odd things with the clips - or is it just on my end? The first one sort of fades away after about ten seconds, then comes back. The second one has a glitch where the music skips.
Me too. The notes also seem to fade away more naturally. I will try in between the two.lejonklou wrote:Regardless, I find a stronger emotion in his voice away from wall. But it wasn't easy. I had a feeling the best position is in between the two?
Thanks u252agz. I did another comparison (not uploaded) and also felt in between was better first listen. I kept comparing and lost my conviction again but will go with the feedback here and those first impressions.u252agz wrote:First two clips - could not decide
Second two -definitely prefer in between
I'm using the free Dropbox and can't store that many files so have to delete the older ones.ThomasOK wrote:I noticed on the one with eight links that the last four are broken.
Maybe you're right. When doing a tunedem for just myself I try to use music I'm not familiar with. Hadn't been doing that here for various reasons. Perhaps I should go back to that approach.u252agz wrote:On ones own system / music I think we know the tune too well and fill in the gaps in terms of timing issues - also perhaps there is tendency to concentrate on the hi fi sounds when the tune is so familiar.
Also too much emotion with ones favorite tracks - gets in the way of objective listening perhaps.
The first video (Apr 04, 10 35 40 PM) sounds much better to me. I find it much easier to follow. The other track has something weird going on with the bass as well - Kind of shut in or compressed. I'm pleased I can hear a clear musical difference between tracks - something I've struggled to hear on my own recordings. Curious what the difference is between them - I can't see anything obvious.ThomasOK wrote:Here are a couple more system videos. Hopefully they are a bit more organized in terms of overlap and volume level. Let me know what you think!
https://www.dropbox.com/s/m6wuh3hsjzp22 ... M.mov?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/1o6i8cy3wj5n0 ... M.mov?dl=0
I absolutely agree with Charlie1. I think this is a perfect example of "in tune" and "out of tune". In the first clip you have a tuneful relation between keyboard and bass like when listening live and in the second clip it is destroyed sounding weird.ThomasOK wrote:Here are a couple more system videos. Hopefully they are a bit more organized in terms of overlap and volume level. Let me know what you think!
https://www.dropbox.com/s/m6wuh3hsjzp22 ... M.mov?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/1o6i8cy3wj5n0 ... M.mov?dl=0
Am I far off if I can feel your disappointment with our answers. :-) I do think this is a tricky one but you could keep your isoblue and experiment with the glass shelf on and of. I really like your Sondek on the isoblue. The sound is like a warm blanket around me. Then you could try the archidee again another time if you are not satisfied!Charlie1 wrote:Rack aligned with new table position now. I took delivery of a glass shelf last night that was kindly donated. It's reported to be the same glass that Naim use. Posted the results below:
Archidee: https://www.dropbox.com/s/cmc058z1maoht ... e.MOV?dl=0
Isoblue with shelf: https://www.dropbox.com/s/lsem08tp7d0r4 ... f.MOV?dl=0
Isoblue only: https://www.dropbox.com/s/2v9c5who7f46z ... y.MOV?dl=0
Apologies for the deluge but I want to make best use of the free time I have now.
This one was frustrating for me: last night initial pass on laptop speakers suggested the first link was better, but the laptop doesn't go loud, so I switched to headphones then thought the second was better... Then, this morning, I tried again on the desktop but that was choppy. All of these were listening streamed, so I gave in and downloaded the clips - now it's clearer & I agree with Charlie1 & beck. Not sure if that's just because I'd read that others preferred 1 vs 2 - struggling to work out if my ears are influencing my brain, or vice versa :/ At least I can hear a clear difference, after downloading, which is more than could be said from streaming ;)ThomasOK wrote:Here are a couple more system videos. Hopefully they are a bit more organized in terms of overlap and volume level. Let me know what you think!
https://www.dropbox.com/s/m6wuh3hsjzp22 ... M.mov?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/1o6i8cy3wj5n0 ... M.mov?dl=0
hehe. No, not disappointed. I had pretty much decided to stick with the Archidee anyway which is why I was happy to take everything apart to make space for it. I'm really enjoying the more insightful clearer sound more than anything. I'm not finding it greatly more musically engaging. I'm not churning through my collection with abandon but I have been wanting to listen more in the evening (normally I just listen during the daytime). The Isoblue does offer something of its own but it's hard to describe. There's a cohesiveness to the music that seems more than just the warm blanket you correctly identify. I wonder if I allow this quality to steer my evaluation too much during a tunedem. That's a wider question of mine that goes beyond just this comparison but I do keep thinking back to when Fredrik compared different ways of connecting Linn amps. He found that one amp per speaker was more cohesive but connecting them in serial was actually easier to follow the tune. I think that's right anyway.beck wrote:Am I far off if I can feel your disappointment with our answers. :-) I do think this is a tricky one but you could keep your isoblue and experiment with the glass shelf on and of. I really like your Sondek on the isoblue. The sound is like a warm blanket around me. Then you could try the archidee again another time if you are not satisfied!
I'm sure I am influenced by others when uncertain. I try to avoid seeing what others have written before listening and posting.tokenbrit wrote:This one was frustrating for me: last night initial pass on laptop speakers suggested the first link was better, but the laptop doesn't go loud, so I switched to headphones then thought the second was better... Then, this morning, I tried again on the desktop but that was choppy. All of these were listening streamed, so I gave in and downloaded the clips - now it's clearer & I agree with Charlie1 & beck. Not sure if that's just because I'd read that others preferred 1 vs 2 - struggling to work out if my ears are influencing my brain, or vice versa :/ At least I can hear a clear difference, after downloading, which is more than could be said from streaming ;)