Old K400 (split) vs New K200

We use the Tune Method to evaluate performance

Moderator: Staff

Charlie1
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 4869
Joined: 2007-12-11 00:30
Location: UK

Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by Charlie1 »

Just got some K200. If it's no good then I'll use it on my second system which just has bell wire at the moment.

I bought 2.48m long, although I guess that may not be optimal for this cable. Same Linn Knekt terminals and solder.

Initial impressions are it's much less tuneful, but it was cold / stiff having just been delivered. I will compare again in a few weeks once it's had some good run in time.

I prefer the K200 sound; better mids/highs and more punch/weight in the bass, so I hope it improves a lot over time, although based on other reports this does seem unlikely now.

EDIT: It's better now it's warmed up to room temperature, but still musically some way off K400. It's just a bit of a drag waiting/hoping it will improve. I might get bored of it sooner rather than later :(
Charlie1
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 4869
Joined: 2007-12-11 00:30
Location: UK

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by Charlie1 »

I've given up. Quite a downgrade and really not enjoying my music.

Anyone know if there is a specific period after which speaker cable breaks in? Does it ever make much difference?

I suppose I could connect a digital device and leave the system playing whenever I'm out.

Shame cos it's a nicer sound.
beck
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 2761
Joined: 2012-10-22 22:25

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by beck »

Thank you for the report Charlie1 on the new speaker cables. Interesting but not really a surprice to me. I have long left the road of “nice sound” and it has made me happy.
Playing cd’s…………
User avatar
lejonklou
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6585
Joined: 2007-01-30 10:38
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by lejonklou »

Thanks for reporting Charlie!

I agree that the Silver K200 sounds nice but performs worse. I had a 250 cm pair a month ago and it completely robbed my system of the magic I'm used to. Sounded nice but there was no spark.

These days I have no patience with anything boring, I'm not impressed by nice sound in the way I used to be. Five years ago I thought "well it sounds nice, so it has something, now if I could only add some magic to it..." But it doesn't work that way. Nice sound is easy, magic is really hard.

Regarding break in I'm sorry to say that soldered joints take almost four months until they're completely settled. However, performance doesn't climb steadily during that period, it fluctuates. Often it starts by sounding good and then within a very short time span - hours to days - it goes into a confused state and then emerges in another good, but different, state. Then it varies between stiff, grey, confused and good until it finally stops varying altogether. The trick is to make it end on 'good'.

This break in period is sometimes hardly noticeable, especially with a product that isn't very good to begin with. But something that is truly magic can appear to have big variations - probably because you sense that suddenly the magic is lost. And then it's back! And then it's lost again. And back!
matthias
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 2108
Joined: 2007-12-25 16:47
Location: Germany

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by matthias »

Fredrik,
now after the K400 has expired, maybe someone from our community here could ask Linn kindly for the manufacturing details or do some reverse engineering to make a single-wire relaunch of it.

Matt
Matt

MBP / Exposure pre + power (both modified) / JBL3677
User avatar
lejonklou
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6585
Joined: 2007-01-30 10:38
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by lejonklou »

It would certainly be nice to know where it was made. I have no clue.

Reverse engineering cables is very tricky to say the least (I nearly wrote 'impossible'). I have ordered precisely defined cable constructions and they never sound the same from factory to factory. It's similar to all those power cords sounding so surprisingly different - many of them have identical dimensions and materials.

I know there's supposed to be one cable company that manufactures audio cables for the majority of European HiFi brands, but I've never learned which that company is. Anyone who knows?
User avatar
macrotech2
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 460
Joined: 2012-04-27 07:58

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by macrotech2 »

Interesting reports on the K200.

At the Linn factory event a couple of years ago I was talking to Phil Budd in the bar and he said as I recall that they couldn’t get hold of the K400 any more. He also agreed with your findings that it sounded more hi-fi, but less tuneful, and was likely to divide opinion.
Källa/Sagatun Mono 1.7/Tundra Mono 3/Avalon Idea Mk2
matthias
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 2108
Joined: 2007-12-25 16:47
Location: Germany

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by matthias »

Interesting that Linn launch a product which is inferior to its predecessor.
I am wondering what would happen if they do the same with DS or LP12.

Matt
Matt

MBP / Exposure pre + power (both modified) / JBL3677
Charlie1
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 4869
Joined: 2007-12-11 00:30
Location: UK

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by Charlie1 »

macrotech2 wrote:At the Linn factory event a couple of years ago I was talking to Phil Budd in the bar and he said as I recall that they couldn’t get hold of the K400 any more. He also agreed with your findings that it sounded more hi-fi, but less tuneful, and was likely to divide opinion.
That's a little comfort in my view. It would be worse if they thought it sounded musically superior.

The new K200 is a good size/colour. It's much less obtrusive, being rounded and lighter tone. I wonder if cosmetics featured in their requirements for the new cable - i.e. from upper management / marketing team.
matthias
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 2108
Joined: 2007-12-25 16:47
Location: Germany

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by matthias »

Charlie1 wrote:The new K200 is a good size/colour to aim for though. It's much less obtrusive, being rounded and lighter tone.
Yes, it is a trend that audio gear is more appealing to the eye than to the ear.

Matt
Matt

MBP / Exposure pre + power (both modified) / JBL3677
User avatar
macrotech2
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 460
Joined: 2012-04-27 07:58

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by macrotech2 »

And don't forget the huge increase in cost.
Källa/Sagatun Mono 1.7/Tundra Mono 3/Avalon Idea Mk2
User avatar
macrotech2
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 460
Joined: 2012-04-27 07:58

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by macrotech2 »

matthias wrote:Interesting that Linn launch a product which is inferior to its predecessor.
I am wondering what would happen if they do the same with DS or LP12.

Matt
I think this was Phil's personal opinion, but others in Linn believed it superior. Please remember this was two years ago so I can't remember the full details.
Källa/Sagatun Mono 1.7/Tundra Mono 3/Avalon Idea Mk2
matthias
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 2108
Joined: 2007-12-25 16:47
Location: Germany

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by matthias »

macrotech2 wrote:And don't forget the huge increase in cost.
Yes, AFAIK double price.

Matt
Matt

MBP / Exposure pre + power (both modified) / JBL3677
matthias
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 2108
Joined: 2007-12-25 16:47
Location: Germany

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by matthias »

macrotech2 wrote: I think this was Phil's personal opinion, but others in Linn believed it superior.

Maybe they should reinforce their tune dem training department.

Matt
Matt

MBP / Exposure pre + power (both modified) / JBL3677
beck
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 2761
Joined: 2012-10-22 22:25

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by beck »

matthias wrote:
macrotech2 wrote: I think this was Phil's personal opinion, but others in Linn believed it superior.

Maybe they should reinforce their tune dem training department.

Matt
Ivor has left the building. We are left with the remains (2nd hand) of tuneful equipment. :-)
Playing cd’s…………
matthias
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 2108
Joined: 2007-12-25 16:47
Location: Germany

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by matthias »

beck wrote: Ivor has left the building. We are left with the remains (2nd hand) of tuneful equipment. :-)
Yes, the results are somewhat mixed, but David Williamson does a very good job and the new DS (now with DSD support too) is clearly better than its predecessor.

Matt
Matt

MBP / Exposure pre + power (both modified) / JBL3677
User avatar
Music Lover
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 1673
Joined: 2007-01-31 20:35
Location: In front of Lejonklou/JBL/Ofil

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by Music Lover »

matthias wrote:Interesting that Linn launch a product which is inferior to its predecessor.
I am wondering what would happen if they do the same with DS or LP12.

Matt
Well, they do that since many years. (DS Firmware, and before that Unidisk firmware)
Today it’s all about features and hence...some FW are good, some not.
It's all about musical understanding!
Jacsimo
Member
Member
Posts: 18
Joined: 2016-01-30 14:44

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by Jacsimo »

If new K200 is really not up to it, please can members recommend an alternative.

I do know of at least one member who is really happy with new K200 too!

I’m looking forward to buying my First Tundra and would like a good cable to singe wire passive connection to Akudoriks.

Unfortunately they’ll need to be c.5.5m long and ideally no larger dia than new K200 (8mm) for running under carpet.

It will replace Chord Rumour Install which is silvered and hence a little bright.

Thx
User avatar
lejonklou
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6585
Joined: 2007-01-30 10:38
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by lejonklou »

matthias wrote:
macrotech2 wrote:And don't forget the huge increase in cost.
Yes, AFAIK double price.

Matt
No, the new Silver K200 is exactly 3.4 times as expensive as a K400 split in half.
matthias
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 2108
Joined: 2007-12-25 16:47
Location: Germany

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by matthias »

lejonklou wrote: No, the new Silver K200 is exactly 3.4 times as expensive as a K400 split in half.
Bravo, quite an achievement, similar to the price increase of the belt!

Matt
Last edited by matthias on 2017-12-08 22:15, edited 1 time in total.
Matt

MBP / Exposure pre + power (both modified) / JBL3677
sunbeamgls
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 1090
Joined: 2012-04-04 15:19
Location: North Wales
Contact:

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by sunbeamgls »

Jacsimo wrote:If new K200 is really not up to it, please can members recommend an alternative.

I do know of at least one member who is really happy with new K200 too!

I’m looking forward to buying my First Tundra and would like a good cable to singe wire passive connection to Akudoriks.

Unfortunately they’ll need to be c.5.5m long and ideally no larger dia than new K200 (8mm) for running under carpet.

It will replace Chord Rumour Install which is silvered and hence a little bright.

Thx
Naim SuperLumina is exceptional - heard it in a number of different systems. It is, however, stupidly priced.
KSH/0; KEBox/2; 3x Tundra Stereo 2.5; PMC fact.12. Blogger. Exakt Design. SO measuring.
sunbeamgls
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 1090
Joined: 2012-04-04 15:19
Location: North Wales
Contact:

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by sunbeamgls »

Music Lover wrote:
matthias wrote:Interesting that Linn launch a product which is inferior to its predecessor.
I am wondering what would happen if they do the same with DS or LP12.

Matt
Well, they do that since many years. (DS Firmware, and before that Unidisk firmware)
Today it’s all about features and hence...some FW are good, some not.
Agreed that it is not certain that later products are better than earlier ones. Keosa was a shadow of Keilidh, as was the matching Centrik II compared to the original (chopped in half Keilidh) version. There's a whole group who believe LK products are better than the current ones (but I think that's too much of a sweeping approach and each product should be considered on its own merits).
KSH/0; KEBox/2; 3x Tundra Stereo 2.5; PMC fact.12. Blogger. Exakt Design. SO measuring.
User avatar
lejonklou
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6585
Joined: 2007-01-30 10:38
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by lejonklou »

matthias wrote:Interesting that Linn launch a product which is inferior to its predecessor.
I am wondering what would happen if they do the same with DS or LP12.
Please note that I have great respect for Linn, they make fantastic analogue and digital sources. Perhaps the best ones you can buy today. And they, together with Naim, are the reason I'm doing what I do today. Thank you Linn! I'm forever grateful and I say that with sincerity any deep humbleness.

However... Everything related to cabling they have unfortunately screwed up in the last decade:
• The best interconnects are the very earliest Silvers, later ones perform about half as good as the best early specimen,
• the black Mogami T kable for Ekos tonearms is much worse than the previous grey version (which is still available for Akito, even as a spare part, please do hurry and buy one before they kill it!),
• the new Knekt bananas are in a new shiny aluminium alloy that looks better but sounds worse than the old matte one,
• and the Silver K200 looks and sounds nice, but has lost the magic of the old K400/K600 (originally it was a K200 but they never released it - guess why!),
• and I won't even mention the K40 speaker cable.
The FlatEarther
Active member
Active member
Posts: 116
Joined: 2012-04-20 00:55

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by The FlatEarther »

I share all your feelings. When I moved from K20 to split K400 I really liked the tunefulness but felt the K20 was much sweeter and open and I still miss that sound but the K400 is definitely superior. However, the the K200 is the worst of both worlds, less tuneful and too bright.

That however, is not the worst sounding linn product which has to be the 350’s. Even at the factory they sounded dire.
Maggio
New member
New member
Posts: 1
Joined: 2017-12-09 10:55

Re: Old K400 (split) vs New K200

Post by Maggio »

Oh I agree, the 350's sound abysmal. Did you own a 350, FlatEarther?
Post Reply