DAC discussions

A DIY digital music streamer with exceptional performance

Moderator: Staff

Sopper
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 430
Joined: 2017-05-16 14:50
Location: The Netherlands

DAC discussions

Post by Sopper »

Split from 'General discussions about HAKAI'
mrco99 wrote:I did miss out on one offered here locally that got snapped away right under my nose by a fellow 'Hakaier' :-)
Guilty as charged :)


A few questions regarding hardware for the HAKAI specialists:
# Streacom Nanopower 160 Watt - this PSU is also available in 120 and 150 Watt; is 160 really required?
# Streacom case - Casefan needed/mandatory? Or does it run cool enough to get away with no fans at all?
# ESI Gigaport+ - Max 96khz resolution, I guess it downsamples HR files 24/192 to 24/96? Is it audible? And why is this unit chosen? (I reckon there are better DACs out there?)
KÄLLA > Sagatun Mono 1.7 > Tundra Mono 3.0 > Graham LS8/1F
Cables: Trivium Audio Cables
User avatar
lejonklou
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6524
Joined: 2007-01-30 10:38
Location: Sweden
Contact:

DAC discussions

Post by lejonklou »

Sopper wrote:A few questions regarding hardware for the HAKAI specialists:
# Streacom Nanopower 160 Watt - this PSU is also available in 120 and 150 Watt; is 160 really required?
There are more than a dozen different "mini-PSU:s" (an internal plug in DC-DC converter driven by an external AC-DC adapter) that can power HAKAI. Nano160 is thoroughly tested and sounds great. It's possible there's an even better one out there - please do try to find one, but make sure you compare it with Nano160!
Sopper wrote:# Streacom case - Casefan needed/mandatory? Or does it run cool enough to get away with no fans at all?
No fan required.
Sopper wrote:# ESI Gigaport+ - Max 96khz resolution, I guess it downsamples HR files 24/192 to 24/96? Is it audible? And why is this unit chosen? (I reckon there are better DACs out there?)
There is no better DAC out there for this application. The reason is the isochronous USB transmission and the simple but optimal filter.
Lego
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 1147
Joined: 2007-04-18 11:42
Location: glasgow

DAC discussions

Post by Lego »

Sopper wrote:
mrco99 wrote:I did miss out on one offered here locally that got snapped away right under my nose by a fellow 'Hakaier' :-)
Guilty as charged :)


A few questions regarding hardware for the HAKAI specialists:
# Streacom Nanopower 160 Watt - this PSU is also available in 120 and 150 Watt; is 160 really required?
# Streacom case - Casefan needed/mandatory? Or does it run cool enough to get away with no fans at all?
# ESI Gigaport+ - Max 96khz resolution, I guess it downsamples HR files 24/192 to 24/96? Is it audible? And why is this unit chosen? (I reckon there are better DACs out there?)
How can you reckon there is a better dac out there Sopper have you heard ESI Gigaport ,or do you implicitly trust your calculations ?If you have found one thats better at the same price or cheaper I really do hope you post your findings....Cant promise you a finders fee though
I know that tune
Sopper
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 430
Joined: 2017-05-16 14:50
Location: The Netherlands

DAC discussions

Post by Sopper »

lejonklou wrote:
Sopper wrote:# ESI Gigaport+ - Max 96khz resolution, I guess it downsamples HR files 24/192 to 24/96? Is it audible? And why is this unit chosen? (I reckon there are better DACs out there?)
There is no better DAC out there for this application. The reason is the isochronous USB transmission and the simple but optimal filter.
Alright, I’ll settle for this one then
Lego wrote: How can you reckon there is a better dac out there Sopper have you heard ESI Gigaport ,or do you implicitly trust your calculations ?If you have found one thats better at the same price or cheaper I really do hope you post your findings....Cant promise you a finders fee though
Haven’t heard many DACs, but there is a lot to choose from.

If Fredrik says it’s the best (so far), I’ll take his word for it.
KÄLLA > Sagatun Mono 1.7 > Tundra Mono 3.0 > Graham LS8/1F
Cables: Trivium Audio Cables
Lego
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 1147
Joined: 2007-04-18 11:42
Location: glasgow

DAC discussions

Post by Lego »

Sopper wrote:
lejonklou wrote:
Sopper wrote:# ESI Gigaport+ - Max 96khz resolution, I guess it downsamples HR files 24/192 to 24/96? Is it audible? And why is this unit chosen? (I reckon there are better DACs out there?)
There is no better DAC out there for this application. The reason is the isochronous USB transmission and the simple but optimal filter.
Alright, I’ll settle for this one then
Lego wrote: How can you reckon there is a better dac out there Sopper have you heard ESI Gigaport ,or do you implicitly trust your calculations ?If you have found one thats better at the same price or cheaper I really do hope you post your findings....Cant promise you a finders fee though
Haven’t heard many DACs, but there is a lot to choose from.

If Fredrik says it’s the best (so far), I’ll take his word for it.
It's a leap of faith Sopper
I know that tune
matthias
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 2092
Joined: 2007-12-25 16:47
Location: Germany

DAC discussions

Post by matthias »

lejonklou wrote: There is no better DAC out there for this application. The reason is the isochronous USB transmission and the simple but optimal filter.
Fredrik,

do you think isochronous is musically superior to asynchronous USB transmission?
Thanks

Matt
Matt

MBP / Exposure pre + power (both modified) / JBL3677
User avatar
lejonklou
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6524
Joined: 2007-01-30 10:38
Location: Sweden
Contact:

DAC discussions

Post by lejonklou »

matthias wrote:
lejonklou wrote: There is no better DAC out there for this application. The reason is the isochronous USB transmission and the simple but optimal filter.
Fredrik,

do you think isochronous is musically superior to asynchronous USB transmission?
Thanks

Matt
Isochronous USB provides an much less processed connection between the digital source (in this case, the Gigabyte motherboard) and the DAC. This gives the motherboard more influence over the sound quality; if it's good, it will sound good. But if it's not very good it will not sound very good. And there is zero tolerance for dropouts in the datastream.

Asynchronous will buffer the signal from the digital source and try to isolate the DAC from the quality aspects of the datastream. In practice those qualities will however still leak through to the DAC and can be heard. The increased processing is not good for sound quality, unless you fine tune every component and its process for maximum musicality. Every step of the transmission and processing has a musical impact.

Travelling digital signals are very sensitive to processing, much more so than I first thought. To make digital signal processing musical is very difficult, so the simpler the processing is, the easier it becomes to get it right.
Lego
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 1147
Joined: 2007-04-18 11:42
Location: glasgow

DAC discussions

Post by Lego »

lejonklou wrote:
matthias wrote:
lejonklou wrote: There is no better DAC out there for this application. The reason is the isochronous USB transmission and the simple but optimal filter.
Fredrik,

do you think isochronous is musically superior to asynchronous USB transmission?
Thanks

Matt
Isochronous USB provides an much less processed connection between the digital source (in this case, the Gigabyte motherboard) and the DAC. This gives the motherboard more influence over the sound quality; if it's good, it will sound good. But if it's not very good it will not sound very good. And there is zero tolerance for dropouts in the datastream.

Asynchronous will buffer the signal from the digital source and try to isolate the DAC from the quality aspects of the datastream. In practice those qualities will however still leak through to the DAC and can be heard. The increased processing is not good for sound quality, unless you fine tune every component and its process for maximum musicality. Every step of the transmission and processing has a musical impact.

Travelling digital signals are very sensitive to processing, much more so than I first thought. To make digital signal processing musical is very difficult, so the simpler the processing is, the easier it becomes to get it right.
Thanks Fredrik thats good to know.

What changed your mind about the noise issue with USB dacs , and where do you see Hakai upgrades coming from in the future as it seems as far as hardware goes travelling to the past is better.
I know that tune
User avatar
lejonklou
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6524
Joined: 2007-01-30 10:38
Location: Sweden
Contact:

DAC discussions

Post by lejonklou »

Lego wrote:
lejonklou wrote:Isochronous USB provides an much less processed connection between the digital source (in this case, the Gigabyte motherboard) and the DAC. This gives the motherboard more influence over the sound quality; if it's good, it will sound good. But if it's not very good it will not sound very good. And there is zero tolerance for dropouts in the datastream.

Asynchronous will buffer the signal from the digital source and try to isolate the DAC from the quality aspects of the datastream. In practice those qualities will however still leak through to the DAC and can be heard. The increased processing is not good for sound quality, unless you fine tune every component and its process for maximum musicality. Every step of the transmission and processing has a musical impact.

Travelling digital signals are very sensitive to processing, much more so than I first thought. To make digital signal processing musical is very difficult, so the simpler the processing is, the easier it becomes to get it right.
Thanks Fredrik thats good to know.

What changed your mind about the noise issue with USB dacs , and where do you see Hakai upgrades coming from in the future as it seems as far as hardware goes travelling to the past is better.
I'm not sure whether I changed my mind about USB. There are better ways of connecting the motherboard to the DAC than using the USB port, but this way is very simple and good enough. HAKAI is a DIY project.

Regarding HAKAI upgrades, I don't think that "past is better" is any definitive rule. I think it's rather a matter of unfortunate circumstances.
* It seems the data compressing controller IC's of current SSD's is the main reason why they sound bad - which may change in the future.
* There is a bunch of new low-power/heat/clock frequency motherboards that seem promising, but so far the ones I've tried have been a disappointment. This bad luck may change at any moment.
* Isochronous USB DAC's are definitely not in fashion right now, so there I'm unsure. But it's possible to build one from scratch, using a great DAC chip. Not that I'm doing so at the moment, I'm just saying it's possible.
* The power supply definitely doesn't follow the "past is better" rule. There might be better ones out there than Nano160.
matthias
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 2092
Joined: 2007-12-25 16:47
Location: Germany

DAC discussions

Post by matthias »

lejonklou wrote:There are better ways of connecting the motherboard to the DAC than using the USB port, but this way is very simple and good enough.
Fredrik,
what do you have in mind, maybe Thunderbolt like some professional DACs?
Thanks

Matt
Matt

MBP / Exposure pre + power (both modified) / JBL3677
User avatar
lejonklou
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6524
Joined: 2007-01-30 10:38
Location: Sweden
Contact:

DAC discussions

Post by lejonklou »

matthias wrote:
lejonklou wrote:There are better ways of connecting the motherboard to the DAC than using the USB port, but this way is very simple and good enough.
Fredrik,
what do you have in mind, maybe Thunderbolt like some professional DACs?
Thanks

Matt
I'd pick I2S if I could only choose one.

I don't really know anything about Thunderbolt. The USB-C connector that it's now using seems promising (I mean in general, not specifically for audio).

But there is a big difference between speculation and what actually sounds best, in practice!
User avatar
ThomasOK
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 4358
Joined: 2007-02-02 18:41
Location: United States
Contact:

DAC discussions

Post by ThomasOK »

While I know a bit about the different connection methods, I'm not conversant with the audio qualities each one has. One interface that I think Linn introduced to streamers is HDMI and it seems to be gaining popularity with DAC manufacturers. I'm told it is more robust than USB having been designed to handle much more data. But I think one of the main reasons it is catching on is it allows a DAC to decode SACDs which can't be done through other connections. Of course, it also allows the decoding of movie soundtracks, the main reason Linn appears to have implemented it. That said I have never been thrilled with HDMI with its content protection hardware and the constant changes to the specs, hardware and cabling needed.

I have heard I2S is good but haven't seen it used a lot. Interestingly it looks like HDMI cabling is one of the more common ways to hook it up although Etnernet cables are also apparently used.
The LP12 Whisperer
Manufacturer, Distributor, Retailer and above all lover of music.
matthias
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 2092
Joined: 2007-12-25 16:47
Location: Germany

DAC discussions

Post by matthias »

lejonklou wrote: I don't really know anything about Thunderbolt.
https://www.computeraudiophile.com/foru ... ent-861705

Matt
Matt

MBP / Exposure pre + power (both modified) / JBL3677
User avatar
lejonklou
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6524
Joined: 2007-01-30 10:38
Location: Sweden
Contact:

DAC discussions

Post by lejonklou »

matthias wrote:
lejonklou wrote: I don't really know anything about Thunderbolt.
https://www.computeraudiophile.com/foru ... ent-861705

Matt
Thanks matthias!
User avatar
vicdiaz
Active member
Active member
Posts: 248
Joined: 2007-02-06 04:37
Location: Trujillo Alto, PR U.S.A.
Contact:

DAC discussions

Post by vicdiaz »

If I'm reading correctly USB audio data is transferred in 'Isochronous' mode is all USB DACs. Synchronization mode is a different story for which you have different flavors though:

https://www.edn.com/design/consumer/437 ... -USB-Audio

http://www.thewelltemperedcomputer.com/KB/USB.html
Vic
Ivor's "Tune-Method Seminar" Alumni
User avatar
lejonklou
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6524
Joined: 2007-01-30 10:38
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: DAC discussions

Post by lejonklou »

vicdiaz wrote:If I'm reading correctly USB audio data is transferred in 'Isochronous' mode is all USB DACs. Synchronization mode is a different story for which you have different flavors though:

https://www.edn.com/design/consumer/437 ... -USB-Audio

http://www.thewelltemperedcomputer.com/KB/USB.html
Not sure what you mean, Vic.

Gigaport HD+ operates in what they call USB adaptive mode. The motherboard sets the pace of conversion.
William
Member
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: 2016-07-19 16:52
Location: Glasgow

Re: DAC discussions

Post by William »

Hi All,

This is probably the wrong place to post this question but I couldn’t find anywhere suitable, probably because it’s not the smartest question.

In my excitement to build a ‘Hakai’, I realised that I might need a preamp, a slight oversight :(. My current setup is: LP12 (Gaia), KDSM, Tundra 2 and 242’s so I’ve not needed a pre-amp up to now.

Do I need a pre-amp, I assume this is a yes.

Thanks,

William
Sopper
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 430
Joined: 2017-05-16 14:50
Location: The Netherlands

Re: DAC discussions

Post by Sopper »

KDSM is/can function as preamplifier
You will need RCA to XLR cables though
KÄLLA > Sagatun Mono 1.7 > Tundra Mono 3.0 > Graham LS8/1F
Cables: Trivium Audio Cables
William
Member
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: 2016-07-19 16:52
Location: Glasgow

Re: DAC discussions

Post by William »

Ok, thanks.

I’ve got RCA to XLR cables so I now I’m just waiting on the power supply.

Best regards,

William
Sopper
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 430
Joined: 2017-05-16 14:50
Location: The Netherlands

Re: DAC discussions

Post by Sopper »

I have decided to give up on the ESI dac for now.
It just won’t work like i would like with Volumio, Bubbleupnp server and Kazoo combination.
The RME dac works flawlessly, no matter what Volumio version, mpd version, upmpdcli version...
KÄLLA > Sagatun Mono 1.7 > Tundra Mono 3.0 > Graham LS8/1F
Cables: Trivium Audio Cables
Sopper
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 430
Joined: 2017-05-16 14:50
Location: The Netherlands

Re: DAC discussions

Post by Sopper »

Since Debian Stretch in combination with MPD and Upmpdcli, the ESI is working perfectly, but makes Linux downsample to 16/44. Since I have Qobuz Sublime+ I’d like to find a dac capable of HR files.

I would really like to try other DACs and maybe you can help me to find candidates.

The DACs I like to try and test must have (all) the following specifications:
- The dac runs in adaptive isonchronous mode
- The dac is capable to play 24/96 or 24/192
- The dac has stereo output (and not 8 outputs like the ESI)
- The dac is affordable... ESI gigaport HD+ price point (+/- €160)
- The dac is not bad measured by Amirm (audiosciencereview.com)
KÄLLA > Sagatun Mono 1.7 > Tundra Mono 3.0 > Graham LS8/1F
Cables: Trivium Audio Cables
Lego
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 1147
Joined: 2007-04-18 11:42
Location: glasgow

Re: DAC discussions

Post by Lego »

Sopper wrote: 2018-12-28 20:37 Since Debian Stretch in combination with MPD and Upmpdcli, the ESI is working perfectly, but makes Linux downsample to 16/44. Since I have Qobuz Sublime+ I’d like to find a dac capable of HR files.

I would really like to try other DACs and maybe you can help me to find candidates.

The DACs I like to try and test must have (all) the following specifications:
- The dac runs in adaptive isonchronous mode
- The dac is capable to play 24/96 or 24/192
- The dac has stereo output (and not 8 outputs like the ESI)
- The dac is affordable... ESI gigaport HD+ price point (+/- €160)
- The dac is not bad measured by Amirm (audiosciencereview.com)
That's all very well Sopper but if you really want to improve the Hakai you should be out in the field buying and testing different motherboards rather than tinkering with the least important part of the Hakai chain,but then if tinkering for tinkering sake is your bag... or you could just buy all the dacs for ~£160 and listen to them and let us know
I know that tune
FairPlayMotty
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 769
Joined: 2018-08-28 11:10
Location: Scotland

Re: DAC discussions

Post by FairPlayMotty »

Is there merit in an alternative approach of asking ESI to have their DACs added to the Linux kernel?
Everything is a remix: Copy, Transform, Combine.
Sopper
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 430
Joined: 2017-05-16 14:50
Location: The Netherlands

Re: DAC discussions

Post by Sopper »

I want to enjoy the HAKAI in HR and that’s why I am searching for a DAC.
KÄLLA > Sagatun Mono 1.7 > Tundra Mono 3.0 > Graham LS8/1F
Cables: Trivium Audio Cables
Sopper
Very active member
Very active member
Posts: 430
Joined: 2017-05-16 14:50
Location: The Netherlands

Re: DAC discussions

Post by Sopper »

FairPlayMotty wrote: 2018-12-31 16:29 Is there merit in an alternative approach of asking ESI to have their DACs added to the Linux kernel?
I asked them already and they are not putting any effort in Linux
KÄLLA > Sagatun Mono 1.7 > Tundra Mono 3.0 > Graham LS8/1F
Cables: Trivium Audio Cables
Post Reply