Not only were they really fine reviews but both the Slipsik5.1 and the Kinki3 are listed in the Recommended Components section as Class B. Considering the average prices of the units in Class A and the fact that the Kinki3 is the least expensive MM phono stage in Class B this is a pretty strong recommendation.
So, what's the next step to make the most of this? Can you capitolise on it very much? Maybe get another magazine to review them? It's bound to generate more enquiries, so would be good to keep up momentum.
Charlie1 wrote:So, what's the next step to make the most of this? Can you capitolise on it very much? Maybe get another magazine to review them? It's bound to generate more enquiries, so would be good to keep up momentum.
a review like that surely mean good business. I guess availability of the products need to tie in to make the wheels spin more?
Last week I finally got hold of a copy of Stereophile's October issue.
I noticed that near the end of the magazine, they had a 'manufacturer's comments' section. Thomas OK had written a nice piece there, about names. It made me smile.